In October of 2011, Obama for America launched the Futuro Fund so that supporters like you could make an investment our community’s future and own a piece of this campaign. You have stepped up in a VERY big way. With your leadership and generous contributions we have raised an unprecedented amount and proven that Latinos stand with President Obama.

Over the course of the last few months, we have worked with you to expand our movement. As we launch Latinos for Obama nationwide this month, the Futuro Fund is asking you to take the next step and bring the conversation into your living room.

“On Thursday April 26th, supporters across the country are hosting Futuro Fund House Parties to talk with their friends and neighbors about what’s at stake for our community between now and November.”

Hosting a house party is as simple as inviting folks to your home, chatting about why you decided to get involved and asking them to step up and own a piece of the campaign too.

As a leader of the Futuro Fund, can you host a grassroots fundraising party on Thursday April 26th? Sign up here to get started.

If you don’t normally do this sort of thing, don’t worry. We’ll help you every step of the way and provide you with all of the information and materials to make your party a success. During your party, you and your guests will join campaign leadership for an exciting National Call.

This effort is historic. This campaign will be won or lost in our community and you can make all the difference. Please help us build the best grassroots organization in American history!

Sign up today to host a grassroots fundraising party.


SUBSCRIBE to The Hispanic Blog to stay on top of the latest latino news, politics and entertainment!


If you have any questions, concerns or simply would like to get a quote on my Marketing, Public Relations, Social Media and/or Events services, please feel free to contact me.

God Bless and make it a fabulous day!

powered by Influential Access – “Transforming the Ordinary to EXTRAordinary!” – CEO – Jessica Marie Gutierrez – Creator of The Hispanic Blog #thehispanicblog



  1. Hello to all of you. I am a political blogger and post to many of the sites here in the U.S. I am also a Republican but have been, for many years a Democrat. When Barack Obama became president, I changes once I saw what he was about. I tell you these things for your own good. So many people in the U.S. are either in a state of serious denial or they just do not want to know the truth. First of all, I know that many Mexicans, whites and blacks will support Obama simple because he is black. Many others will support him because they believe he will give them everything they want. I guess those are valid reasons to the person they belong to. I do know this however, Obama is a devout Muslim and believes in Allah. He does not believe in God. He is anti-American, pro-socialist and practices the trick he learned by studying Saul Alinsky’s book on organizing a society. If you vote for Obama, you are voting for a man who is without God, a man who will give you what you want, for a short time only. The man has lied from day one and has an administration that is bent on racial divide and hate. That is the way he will re-organize society…racial hatred and division in his attempt to make the US into a marxist nation. Do not fall for the deceits of this man. Do not vote for him. You are a part of the American society and I am sure you want the very same things I and millions of other Americans want….less taxes, better chances for ourselves and our children, health and hoped for prosperity. We do not want a country this is based on Islam and we do not want a president who is Islamc from birth.

    • Thank you for your comment as I do believe everyone is entitled 2 their opinion and can appreciate that you are making the effort to be politically involved. That is definitely commendable, however “for healthy debate’s sake,” I would like to point out that I am a Christian and President Obama has always declared he is a Christian. He went to the same Christian church for 20 years & for his inauguration even had the Lincoln Bible especially chosen.

      On the other hand, let’s just say that you are right & he has been lying to everyone & is this undercover Muslim. If we review history, in Judaism, one prays to the God of Abraham, Isaac & Jacob. In Christianity, one also prays to the God of Abraham Isaac & Jacob only we now do it in the name of Jesus who is the Divine Son of God. The Islam religion also branched off of Judaism and also prays to the God of Abraham, however they don’t believe there is the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob because then that is stating that the Jews are the chosen ones which they do not believe. Ishmael was also the son of Abraham and thus they also believe that they are also chosen. Therefore, they believe in the God of Abraham but choose to use the Arabic word Allah because they feel it is pure where as the English word God can be misused.

      For example, God + s = Gods If you add ‘S’ to God, it becomes Gods that is plural of God. Allah is one and singular there is no plural of Allah. Same with godfather, godmother, etc., therefore because they feel it is more sacred they use the word “Allah.” Just as the Jews used the tetragrammaton YHWH which is supposed to be the equivalent to “Yahweh.” Remember the term was removed because they did not feel worthy enough to use God’s personal name that they began associating him to “Elohim”, “Adonai,” “El Shaddai” etc. The word “Addonai” Translators often render YHWH as a word meaning “Lord”, e.g., Greek Κυριος, Latin Dominus, and following that, English “the LORD”, Welsh Arglwydd, etc.

      Therefore, the Muslim religion believes in the God of Abraham very much. The terrorists have been Muslim but it is not fair of us to judge an entire religion based on the acts of a few bad seeds. If we classify every Muslim as a terrorist, then isn’t that being “UnAmerican” of us?

      Now, let’s look at Romney’s religion. He is a Mormon and they consider themselves to be under the Christian umbrella. However, the reason there is so much controversy with their religion being associated to Christianity is because a Christian believes in the teachings of Christ and that He is in fact the Divine Son of God. However, Mormons believe Christ existed, but they do not believe Jesus Christ was the Messiah & the Divine Son of God. Rather they believe that each of us has a god-like spirit that can cause us to be somewhat divine, so when Jesus performed miracles it was not because He was divine rather it was because He knew how to utilize that “divine” human spirit within all of us. Therefore, like the Mormons, Muslims also believe that Jesus existed but that He was not the Divine Son of God. However, the Muslims are biblical in the sense that they do not believe we have a divine human spirit rather they believe Jesus was a prophet God used and go as far as even believing that Jesus Christ was indeed born of Immaculate Conception.

      Therefore if President Obama were in fact Muslim, then both Romney and him have religions with the same core belief…there is only one God; the God of Abraham and Jesus was just a man not the Son of God.

      Additionally, the majority of Latinos side with President Obama not because he’s black but because he is addressing the issues Latinos believe in & are important to them. On the other hand Romney has been on the opposite side of every issue that is important to Hispanics.

      This blog does not endorse either candidate or either party; we simply provide facts, information & resources that pertain to the Hispanic community.

      I believe it is very important to be involved politically and therefore I thank you & appreciate your comment. God bless!

      This blog does not endorse either candidate. We simply provide facts, information & resources that pertain to the Hispanic community.

      I believe it is very important to be involved politically and therefore I thank you & appreciate your comment. God bless!

      • Thank you for your input. Without going all the way back to the creation of Earth and the very beginnings of humanity and religion, I will say that Obama spent 20 years in the church of Jeremiah Wright, the pastor now famous for all his speeches and sermons in which he repeatedly spit out the phrase “god damn America”. Obama was in his congregation for decades. Obama has not signed what is called an EO…executive order…that will allow the additional influx of 70,000 muslims. Obama is a muslim and he does not dispute it. I simply wanted to give all of you an advanced warning.

      • Thank you and I appreciate it as I believe my followers should have all the facts. One last thing though….it was because of President Obama and giving Seal Team 6 the Executive Order that Osama Bin Laden was captured. Even though President Bush began the War on Terror President Obama still finished it. Remember that moment for him to capture Osama was extremely risky because of civilians and the fact that he knew he couldn’t just burn him and say he’s dead. He would have to risk even American lives by having our ppl actually bring his body back to prove they actually killed him. Thus, for healthy debate he could have easily said the task was too hard allowing Osama a free pass without anyone even realizing it. He also knew capturing him would make world news, so every terrorist and Muslim would know he made that he gave that order. Thus, if he “for debate’s sake” were on the evil side, why even capture Osama?

        Additionally, when candidates are in political campaigns they set aside money in their budgets to get opposition research which tells the candidate, which reveals everything about the candidate. If there was actually proof that President Obama lied about his religion that would be the first thing the Republicans would attack to “take back America.” I was on a campaign, and I handled our opposition research, and thus I know how detailed these reports are. Therefore that leaves another question open, “If it’s in fact ‘known’ that the President is Muslim, why haven’t the Republicans been able to produce any evidence to confirm this?”

        On another note, since we are presenting the facts, this was President Obama’s response to former senior Pastor Jeremiah Wright who had a church congregation of 6,000 people before he retired:

        …we’ve heard my former pastor…use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike.

        I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely — just as I’m sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.

        But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren’t simply controversial. They weren’t simply a religious leader’s effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country — a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America…”

        Obama went on to say that Wright’s views were “not only wrong but divisive… at a time when we need unity.”He posed the rhetorical question of why he would have allied himself with Reverend Wright in the first place. Arguing that Wright and Trinity United Church of Christ had been misrepresented by “the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and YouTube,” Obama spoke of Wright’s service to the poor and needy, and of the role Wright played in his own journey to Christianity.

        Obama stated that like other black churches, Trinity contained the full spectrum of the black community: “the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America.”
        Similarly, he argued that Wright “contains within him the contradictions — the good and the bad — of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.”

        Therefore, Obama stated:
        “ I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother — a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.
        These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love.”
        Emphasizing that he was in no way justifying or excusing Wright’s comments, Obama said that to dismiss Wright as a “crank or a demagogue” … “would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America — to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality.”

        Obama then invoked the history of racial inequality in the United States, first by paraphrasing a line by William Faulkner: “The past isn’t dead and buried. In fact, it isn’t even past.”He argued that many of the difficulties in African-American communities could be traced to the sufferings of previous generations under slavery and Jim Crow laws. Obama observed that, in the era in which African-Americans of Reverend Wright’s generation grew up, segregation and degradation were common. Even blacks of that generation who, like Wright, surmounted obstacles to succeed in life often remained bitter and angry about their experiences with racism. Obama noted:

        “ That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table…occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews. The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright’s sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning. That anger is not always productive…it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change. But the anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races. ”

        Obama then shifted to an expression of what he called “a similar anger” in the white community based on resentments over busing, affirmative action, and the way in which fears about crime are often met with accusations of racism. Obama stated that these resentments were rooted in legitimate concerns — dismissing them as misguided or racist only widened the racial divide and increased misunderstanding.

        Obama described the resultant situation as “a racial stalemate we’ve been stuck in for years.”He pointed out that his “imperfect” candidacy is not the solution to racial division, but argued that it is possible and important for Americans of all races to work together to overcome it. To that end, he called for the African-American community to “[bind] our particular grievances — for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs — to the larger aspirations of all Americans” and for the white community to acknowledge the “legacy of discrimination … and current incidents of discrimination.” Obama insisted that progress on matters of race was both possible and actual:

        “ The profound mistake of Reverend Wright’s sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society. It’s that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country — a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black; Latino and Asian, rich and poor, young and old — is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past.”

        Obama then presented a choice to his audience. On the one hand the country could continue to address race “only as spectacle — as we did in the OJ trial — or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina — or as fodder for the nightly news.” On the other hand Americans could come together to solve the nation’s problems, in particular the problems of education, health care, jobs moving overseas, the Iraq War, and caring for veterans.

        Obama concluded his speech by relating an anecdote about a young white woman who organized for his campaign in South Carolina and the personal connection she made with an elderly black volunteer.

        “ By itself, that single moment of recognition between that young white girl and that old black man is not enough. It is not enough to give health care to the sick, or jobs to the jobless, or education to our children.”

        But it is where we start. It is where our union grows stronger. And as so many generations have come to realize over the course of the two-hundred and twenty one years since a band of patriots signed that document in Philadelphia, that is where the perfection begins.

      • Thank you for your reply and for the work you put into your comment. As to Obama’s being a U.S. citizen, there is no direct proof. There is, however, very strong suspicions and elements that would indicate he is not a natural born citizen>>
        Then there are the broken promises that he has made and continue to make on a daily basis. They range from a transparent government to the policy of weeding the U.S. off Middle East oil. Here is a link to the broken promises>>
        And, just recently we have the “Lying law”. It is a law that makes it a federal offence to lie and here is a link to explain that and the consequences of that law>>
        Today, Barack Obama is changing times and laws in America, giving himself unprecedented power never before seen. His ObamaCare bill. now the law of the land, empowers him to create his own private army, forces citizens to abide by unconstitutional laws, and will use the IRS in much the same way that Hitler used his brown shirts to make people get in line behind his policies. Many Americans will awake to late to the fact that Obama has subverted the United States Constitution, and stolen our precious liberties and freedoms. That’s why Obama’s followers are encouraged and taught to follow and have faith in Obama the man, and not in our God or in our country. This is exactly the ploy that Hitler used to great and terrible effect in Nazi Germany.
        Rep. Dingell admits that the goal of ObamaCare is to ‘control the people’.
        Some people would balk at the comparison between Hitler and Obama, saying it was unfair. After all, Hitler started WWII and killed 11,000,000 Jews and Gentiles in death camps, and Obama has done nothing like that. Well, it’s only unfair if you compare Hitler at the end of his rule to the beginning of Obama’s. But if you compare Hitler and Obama at the beginning of their rise to power, it’s extremely fair.
        Then, there is the voter fraud issues and Eric Holder, Obama’s appointee to the Dept. of Justice. Holder has, on numerous occasions, enforced voter fraud>>
        I could go on and on. It would do no good. It has been my experience that if a person is pro-Obama, it would not matter if it were proven that he was the devil himself. I have never been political and I have never felt political. But, I know right from wrong. There is simply too much wrong here. Obama has broken every campaign promise he made when running in 2008. He
        has a long history, as does his wife, in corrupt, Chicago-style politics. Both are narcissistic and only interested in the greed factor>>
        I will absolutely guarantee you that when you support Obama, you are supporting a monster>>

        Do you know the park in NYC that the Wall Street protesters were occupying?
        It’s Zuccotti Park. Did you know this park is not owned by the city of New York? It is owned by Brookfield Properties. Brookfield Asset Management received an Obama Department of Energy Loan guarantee of over $160 million within 10 days of approving the take over of the Park. (for some I’m missing the connection between a city park and the Dept of Energy) Brookfield is a Canadian companywith assets of $70 billion. Google it! It is all on their website.
        So WHY is the US Taxpayer guaranteeing a loan to a VERY wealthy Canadian company?!?!
        Well this might help: Who was just hired by Brookfield Properties as an attorney?
        Vice President Joe Biden’s son. And… Who sits on the board of Brookfield Properties?
        Mayor Bloomberg’s live in girlfriend.
        Now, guess what company just received some of the last of the Obama Stimulus $$$$$$$.
        Thaaaaaaaaaaaat’s right, Brookfield Properties. Isn’t life great in America!
        Now guess what, on a completely unrelated note,
        Wisconsin is shaping up to be the swing state in the 2012 presidential elections.
        Not Florida. Not Ohio. But Wisconsin. Now, guess who owns the company that will be tabulating the electronic votes in Wisconsin.
        Thaaaaat’s right, the biggest contributor to Obama, the puppeteer George Soros (who believes he should be king of the world) Whaaaaat a coincidence!
        Now remember what Stalin said. “He who votes does not have the power.
        He who counts the votes has the power”
        Additionally, growing numbers of Latinos are dissatisfied with Obama. So much so that his group has seen a significant decrease in the Latino pro-Obama supporters.>>
        I would admonish you to not simply accept Obama based on any pre-conceived ideologies or past results but rather take a very very close look at the man you support. I have and I absolutely do not like what I see. And, for those who continue to blame Bush for the problems ALL people in the U.S. face today, here is something everyone should know:

        The day the Democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009, it was actually January 3rd 2007,the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, at the very start of the 110th Congress.
        The Democratic Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.
        For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is “Bush’s Fault”, think about this:
        January 3rd, 2007, the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress:
        The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77
        The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%
        The Unemployment rate was 4.6%
        George Bush’s Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB CREATION!
        Remember that day…
        January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.
        The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?
        THANK YOU DEMOCRATS (especially Barney ) for taking us from 13,000 DOW, 3.5 GDP and 4.6% Unemployment…to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES!
        (BTW: Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop Fannie & Freddie -starting in 2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy). Barneyblocked it and called it a “Chicken Little Philosophy” (and the sky did fall!)
        And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac? OBAMA
        And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie?
        OBAMA and the Democrat Congress, especially BARNEY!!!!
        So when someone tries to blame Bush…
        Bush may have been in the car but the Democrats were in charge of the gas pedal and steering wheel they were driving the economy into the ditch.
        Budgets do not come from the White House.. They come from Congress and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democratic Party.
        Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well as 2010 & 2011.
        In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases.
        For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the 2009 budget.

        And where was Barack Obama during this time?He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete 2009. Let’s remember what the deficits looked like during that period:
        If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending. After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets. If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself.
        In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is “I inherited a deficit that I voted for, and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: